We believe that the municipal market enters 2026 from a position of relative stability. Credit fundamentals remain generally solid, defaults have historically been limited, and income levels are attractive relative to recent history. Yet beneath this calm surface, the drivers of performance are changing in important ways. The broad-based supports that helped lift most municipal bonds in recent years are being replaced by a market that is more differentiated, more technical, and less forgiving of imprecision. As the extraordinary federal aid that once eased budget pressures and muted fiscal trade-offs recedes into history, policy outcomes are likely to diverge more meaningfully across states and local governments. These forces increase the gap between issuers with durable, predictable revenue streams and those more reliant on discretionary budget decisions.

Technical forces are reinforcing this shift. Investor demand has become increasingly concentrated in passive and rules-based strategies that favor a narrow set of maturities and bond types, often without regard to valuation. This concentration has left some areas of the market crowded and fully priced, while others remain overlooked and underowned. In 2026, where bonds sit on the curve — and whether investors have the flexibility to reach less trafficked segments — will matter as much as the overall direction of interest rates. At the same time, dispersion is widening across return outcomes. Yield alone is no longer a sufficient guide to performance, particularly in lower-quality segments of the market. As individual credit stories begin to matter more, disciplined security selection, liquidity awareness, and downside risk management become essential components of return generation rather than secondary considerations. Taken together, these shifts suggest that broad, one-size-fits-all exposure may be less effective in 2026. Market conditions are likely to place greater emphasis on selectivity across credit, maturity, structure, and strategy. Investors who emphasize resilience, flexibility, and disciplined risk management may be better positioned to navigate a market in which opportunities remain, but may be unevenly distributed.

Essential service munis lead in 2026, proving revenue resilience

Investment grade essential-service revenue backed bonds, supported by secured or dedicated revenue streams, appear well positioned to outperform their tax-backed equivalents in 2026. Their credit strength is driven less by political decision-making and more by stable, diversified cash flows and strong debt service coverage tied to non-discretionary demand. As fiscal tightening and political churn raise questions around GO flexibility, these revenue sectors may increasingly serve as relative safe havens within the municipal market. 

Political shifts—highlighted by 36 gubernatorial elections—add a secondary layer of uncertainty. Platforms centered on expanded social spending or broader policy ambitions may further pressure operating budgets already challenged by reduced federal inflows. While this political noise will not affect all issuers equally, it is likely to widen dispersion and create pockets of mispricing across the GO market. 

Diminishing federal support is becoming a defining factor for the municipal market in 2026, creating downstream volatility for many state and local governments. As federal aid—pandemic related or otherwise—recedes, budget pressures intensify, leaving governments with fewer resources to manage rising costs, fund social programs, and maintain financial flexibility. These strains fall most heavily on general obligation (GO) credits in our view, where policymakers must navigate competing priorities within increasingly constrained budgets.

Back to Top  

 

Investment grade curve positioning drives returns in 2026

In 2025, the municipal yield curve normalized from significant steepening (Source: Bloomberg), leaving the 12-22 year segment particularly attractive. Regardless of where interest rates ultimately move, we believe the best relative value in investment grade municipals resides in this area. In our observation, persistent demand from SMA and passive strategies has compressed valuations from 10 years and in on the curve, pushing investors toward the outer limits of their comfort zones in search of incremental yield. However, the structural constraints of these investment vehicles ultimately cap their ability to extend further, leaving the most compelling relative value firmly in the hands of flexible, unconstrained managers operating in less crowded portions of the curve.

The structure of the investment grade municipal curve remains one of the most important return drivers for 2026. New issuance patterns should concentrate in shorter and intermediate maturities as issuers seek to capitalize on rich valuations created by SMA and ETF demand. This technical imbalance reinforces valuation compression in the front and belly of the curve and further supports deliberate positioning in the longer end, where superior valuation, favorable rolldown potential, and improved forward return characteristics create a meaningful performance advantage.

Back to Top  

 

Dispersion of high yield muni fund returns puts onus on credit selection vs. income 

Yield isn’t everything in high yield. For those solely focused on the “yield” portion of total returns, it is important to note that income is only one leg of the total return stool, and yield alone is an insufficient guide—particularly as dispersion across high yield fund returns, already evident in 2025, is poised to widen further in 2026. Idiosyncratic credit risks are increasingly driving outcomes and putting price appreciation at risk, especially as several high-profile credit events approach key inflection points. In this environment, capital preservation, volatility management, and the avoidance of permanent impairment are just as critical as income generation.

Emphasizing liquidity, transparency, and proactive downside risk management—while avoiding the more esoteric risks embedded in lower-quality or project-finance-driven credits—allows investors to capture incremental spread without assuming disproportionate volatility. Success in 2026 will depend on disciplined credit research, proactive surveillance, and targeted, thoughtful risk-taking where compensation is clear and measurable.

Back to Top  

 


Intermediate taxable municipals elevate multi-asset portfolios 

Having outperformed the Bloomberg Aggregate Fixed Income index in 8 of the last 10 years (Source: Bloomberg), we believe intermediate taxable municipals can strengthen the return profiles of “core”-focused fixed income portfolios. For multiasset allocators, taxable munis provide an under-recognized source of yield, diversification, and credit resilience that historically have weathered volatility shocks across fixed income markets. 

We expect these benefits to prove particularly prominent when compared with US corporate bonds in 2026, as an oncoming wave of corporate supply could lead to deteriorating technicals as well as negative ratings migration in that asset class. An allocation to taxable munis, which offer greater credit quality stability and a more favorable supplydemand dynamic, is likely to gird multi-asset portfolios against these potential detractors. Rising international interest should only add to this relief by supporting deeper liquidity and tighter spreads.

Back to Top  

 

Complement passive SMA exposure by adding more flexible products 

Passive SMAs have several structural constraints that prevent them from accessing some of the most attractively priced segments of the municipal market. Not only does this reality represent foregone opportunities and exposure to less attractive positions, but it also leaves demand imbalances that increase the relative value of the securities and tactics that these vehicles pass over. That alpha need not be left uncaptured; adding allocations to managers that have greater flexibility can complete the return picture. 

Areas such as AMT bonds, electric and natural-gas prepays, and housing securities remain underrepresented in passive portfolios— not due to credit concerns, but because passive methodologies are not equipped to analyze their structural complexity or variable cash flows. Active managers, by contrast, can target these overlooked areas while also managing positions to proactively capture structural advantages brought by shifting markets.

Back to Top  

    CE Webinar

Top 5 Muni Market Insights for 2026: Discipline Drives Differentiated Results

Friday, January 16, 2026
1PM ET

Accepted for one hour of CFP® CE Credit and IWI CE Credit for live webcast attendees.


Register Now  >

The Muni 360 Podcast

Listen to in-depth conversations, as the seasoned, active investors at MacKay Municipal Managers share their latest views on the municipal market 

Listen and Subscribe >

Get More from the Minds Behind Munis

Visit Muni 360 for more premier insights from the proven team at MacKay Municipal Managers, and learn more about our municipal solutions. 

Go to Muni 360 >

By subscribing you are consenting to receive personalized online advertisements from New York Life Investments.


DISCLOSURES
Availability of this document and products and services provided by MacKay Shields LLC may be limited by applicable laws and regulations in certain jurisdictions and this document is provided only for persons to whom this document and the products and services of MacKay Shields LLC may otherwise lawfully be issued or made available. None of the products and services provided by MacKay Shields LLC are offered to any person in any jurisdiction where such offering would be contrary to local law or regulation. It does not constitute investment advice and should not be construed as an offer to buy securities. The contents of this document have not been reviewed by any regulatory authority in any jurisdiction. This material contains the opinions of the MacKay Municipal Managers™ team of MacKay Shields LLC but not necessarily those of MacKay Shields LLC. The opinions expressed herein are subject to change without notice. This material is distributed for informational purposes only. Forecasts, estimates, and opinions contained herein should not be considered as investment advice or a recommendation of any particular security, strategy or investment product. Information contained herein has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but not guaranteed. Any forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made and MacKay Shields assumes no duty and does not undertake to update forwardlooking statements. No part of this document may be reproduced in any form, or referred to in any other publication, without express written permission of MacKay Shields LLC. ©2026, MacKay Shields LLC. All Rights Reserved. 

MacKay Municipal Managers is a trademark of MacKay Shields LLC. 

MacKay Shields LLC is a wholly owned subsidiary of New York Life Investment Management Holdings LLC, which is wholly owned by New York Life Insurance Company. “New York Life Investments” is both a service mark, and the common trade name of certain investment advisers affiliated with New York Life Insurance Company. Investments are not guaranteed by New York Life Insurance Company or New York Life Investments. 

Past performance is not indicative of future results. It is not possible to invest directly into an index. 

NOTE TO UK AND EUROPEAN UNION INVESTORS This document is intended only for the use of professional investors as defined in the Alternative Investment Fund Manager’s Directive and/or the UK Financial Conduct Authority’s Conduct of Business Sourcebook. To the extent this document has been issued in the United Kingdom, it has been issued by NYL Investments UK LLP, 200 Aldersgate Street, London UK EC1A 4HD, which is authorised and regulated by the UK Financial Conduct Authority. To the extent this document has been issued in the EEA, it has been issued by NYL Investments Europe Limited, 77 Sir John Rogerson’s Quay, Block C Dublin D02 VK60 Ireland. NYL Investments Europe Limited is authorized and regulated by the Central Bank of Ireland (i) to act as an alternative investment fund manager of alternative investment funds under the Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive (Directive 2011/61/EU) and (ii) to provide the services of individual portfolio management, investment advice and the receipt and transmission of orders as defined in Regulation 7(4) of the AIFMD Regulations to persons who meet the definition of “professional client” as set out in the MiFID Regulations. It has passported its license in additional countries in the EEA. This document only describes capabilities of certain affiliates of New York Life Investments and/or MacKay Shields LLC. No such affiliates will accept subscriptions in any funds not admitted to marketing in your country or provide services to potential customers in your country, including discretionary asset management services, except where it is licensed to do so or can rely on an applicable exemption. MacKay Shields LLC is a wholly owned subsidiary of New York Life Investment Management Holdings LLC, which is wholly owned by New York Life Insurance Company. “New York Life Investments” is both a service mark, and the common trade name of certain investment advisers affiliated with New York Life Insurance Company. Investments are not guaranteed by New York Life Insurance Company or New York Life Investments. 

NOTE TO CANADIAN AUDIENCE 
The information in these materials is not an offer to sell securities or a solicitation of an offer to buy securities in any jurisdiction of Canada. In Canada, any offer or sale of securities or the provision of any advisory or investment fund manager services will be made only in accordance with applicable Canadian securities laws. More specifically, any offer or sale of securities will be made in accordance with applicable exemptions to dealer and investment fund manager registration requirements, as well as under an exemption from the requirement to file a prospectus, and any advice given on securities will be made in reliance on applicable exemptions to adviser registration requirements. 

NOTE TO JAPANESE RECIPIENTS 
This is issued by New York Life Investment Management Asia Limited (Financial Instruments Business Operator, Kanto Local Finance Bureau (FIBO) No. 2964, Member of Japan Investment Advisers Association and Type 2 Financial Instruments Firms Association) for institutional investors only. As costs and/or fees to be borne by investors vary depending on circumstances such as products, services, investment period and market conditions, the total amount nor the calculation methods cannot be disclosed in advance. All investments involve risks, including market fluctuation and investors may lose the principal amount invested. Investors should obtain and read the prospectus and/or information set forth in Article 37-3 of the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act carefully before making investment decisions. 

CREDIT RATING DISCLOSURES: 
Bloomberg Credit Rating Disclosure
(for index) For rated securities, credit quality for index classification purposes is assigned as the middle rating of Moody’s, S&P and Fitch; when a rating from only two agencies is available, the lower is used; when only one agency rates a bond, that rating is used. 

COMPARISONS TO AN INDEX: 
Comparisons to a financial index are provided for illustrative purposes only. Comparisons to an index are subject to MacKay Shields LLC is a wholly owned subsidiary of New York Life Investment Management Holdings LLC, which is wholly owned by New York Life Insurance Company. “New York Life Investments” is both a service mark, and the common trade name of certain investment advisers affiliated with New York Life Insurance Company. Investments are not guaranteed by New York Life Insurance Company or New York Life Investments. 8563770 PROD038-25 PRD-00165-12/25 limitations because portfolio holdings, volatility and other portfolio characteristics may differ materially from the index. Unlike an index, portfolios within the composite are actively managed and may also include derivatives. There is no guarantee that any of the securities in an index are contained in any managed portfolio. The performance of an index may assume reinvestment of dividends and income, or follow other index-specific methodologies and criteria, but does not reflect the impact of fees, applicable taxes or trading costs which, unlike an index, may reduce the returns of a managed portfolio. Investors cannot invest in an index. Because of these differences, the performance of an index should not be relied upon as an accurate measure of comparison. 

SOURCE INFORMATION
“Bloomberg®”, “Bloomberg Indices®”, Bloomberg Fixed Income Indices, Bloomberg Equity Indices and all other Bloomberg indices referenced herein are service marks of Bloomberg Finance L.P. and its affiliates, including Bloomberg Index Services Limited (“BISL”), the administrator of the indices (collectively, “Bloomberg”) and have been licensed for use for certain purposes by MacKay Shields LLC (“MacKay Shields”). Bloomberg is not affiliated with MacKay Shields, and Bloomberg does not approve, endorse, review, or recommend MacKay Shields or any products, funds or services described herein. Bloomberg does not guarantee the timeliness, accurateness, or completeness of any data or information relating to MacKay Shields or any products, funds or services described herein.

INDEX DEFINITIONS

The Bloomberg Aggregate Bond Index, or “Agg,” is a critical benchmark for the U.S. investment-grade bond market, reflecting over $50 trillion in fixed-income securities. It includes U.S. Treasurys, high-grade corporate bonds, and other investment-grade assets. While it offers a comprehensive view, it excludes high-yield